Bible Believers' Newsletter #028
"We focus on the PRESENT Truth - what Jesus is doing NOW . .
We greet you in the wonderful Name of our Lord Jesus Christ and appreciate
your fellowship. This newsletter serves those of like precious faith and
whosoever will receive the truth is welcome to feed their soul from the waters
of the River of Life. Everything presented should be confirmed personally in
your own Bible.
Here is the twenty-eighth issue of our Newsletter, if is the substances of a
radio broadcast about recent activities of false religions. We bring you
articles which are always beyond mainstream denominational thought and may be
new to many of you. If some of our comments seem somewhat different to the way
in which you have been taught to perceive as truth, please compare them with
what your Bible says. And if you feel I am not in agreement with the Bible, or
you would like a fuller expansion on some point, please let me know.
God bless . . . Anthony
One World Worship for All
Over the years nominal Christians have become complacent.
They let down the bars on the fence of separation - and the goats came in.
Australia's nominally Christian society enjoys all the civilizing benefits of
the Gospel without participation in the Gospel Itself.
They want the blessings of Christianity, and the sensual
pleasures of the world. Confessed non-Christians and anti-Christians in our
midst are in the vast majority, and they hold the reigns of power.
Unknown to most Australians, the "Open
Conspiracy" of Fabian socialist, HG Wells, is about to be
fulfilled in a NWO. Our world and the curriculum of mainstream denominational
churches is today dictated and administered by Pharisees, the mortal enemies of
our Lord Jesus.
Their UN has embraced a Commission on Religion to assist in
uniting the world in their NWO. "The New American",
(April 3, 1998) quotes UN leaders' ideas on how to introduce "One-World Worship
According to reports, the UN needs this paganism to justify
their program of "sustainable development": their way of controlling
the world's resources, depopulation, and enslaving us serfs. The plan is to
force all nations into "Gaia Hypothesis". This "holds that earth is
itself the deity we should worship, and the UN is the instrument through which
the earth goddess will dictate our forms of devotion."
Webster's New World Dictionary defines Gaia as "earth
personified as the Roman goddess, Tellus, the goddess of the earth". The
"Gaia Atlas of Future Worlds" by Dr. Norman Myers,
"adviser to the UN, WB, US State Department, and Rockefeller Fund," sets "forth
the basic tenets of the Gaia religion."
They talk of earth as a goddess - appealing to feminists who
don't want a male deity. Two thousand feminists at the WCC conference in
Minneapolis in 1993, replaced Jesus Christ with Sophia, to depict the female
aspect of the Father, and promote the one world worship of Gaia. Their
publication appeals for dialogue with all religions to hasten victory.
Norman Myers calls for a "new humanism, a new world view, a
new planetary concern" which requires "a UN ministry of religion." The
"Futurist Magazine" (September-October 1994) says:
"Religions are now headed toward what may eventually form a United Religions
Organization, structured in much the same way as the UN, and sharing the same
As Israel was not to be counted among the nations, God's
people in this day are not to be counted among the denominations.
The report indicates these developments are on their way to
fulfillment; and stresses creation of a "world ethic for living sustainably."
This began in 1991.
"In the same year, globalist theologian Hans Kung was
commissioned by UNESCO to create a 'Declaration of Global
Ethic' which would impose a set of binding commitments upon
religious leaders and institutions." To obtain this projected one-world worship,
Kung insists that "traditional religions have an ethical obligation to cease to
In his 1991 book, "Global Responsibility: In
Search of a New World Ethic", Kung writes: "Any form of... church
conservatism is to be rejected.. To put it bluntly: No regressive or repressive
religion - whether Christian, Islamic, Jewish or whatever provenance - has a
long-term future." . . . How about humanism?
This was the basis of "Brave New
World", by homosexual drug-addict and City of London agent, Aldous
Huxley, who introduced LSD into the USA on behalf of the clandestine Tavistok
Institute, said to be responsible for the Port Arthur Massacre.
The totalitarian nature of all this is seen in Kung's
insistence, "there'll be no room for religious diversity because, 'If ethics is
to function for the well-being of all, it must be indivisible. The undivided
world increasingly needs an undivided ethic.'" So he postulates, "Postmodern men
and women need common values, goals, ideals, visions."
This report on "One World Worship", developed by the UN
says, "The crusade on behalf of the 'Global Ethic' began in earnest on January
25, 1993" when "a colorful collection of religious leaders assembled around the
'Peace Altar' at the UN's Temple of Understanding to inaugurate the 'Year of
Inter-religious Co-operation and Understanding.'" This unveiled the 1993
Parliament of World Religions, and scores of religious leaders signed the
"Declaration of Global Ethics". Not one was a
Christian. These UN religious developments are parallel to and combined with the
Be vigilant, for it's later than you think.
Global Ethics is a totalitarian one world religious
association for a world-socialist society requiring the end of traditional
religions. Gerald Barney, (of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America and a
member of the ecological elite) told the Parliament that "the only alternative
to the destruction of religion is the 'reinterpretation and even rejection of
ancient traditions and assumptions.'" This is taking place in the Ecumenical
Movement, which constantly speaks of the united world church and humanity.
According to Barney, "Five billion humans must prepare to
die to 20th century ways of thinking and being... Every person must learn to
think like earth, to act like earth, to be earth." Current emphasis on ecology
with the observance of Earth Day on Lenin's birthday for the past 28 years, has
as its underlying purpose, the establishment of a one-world worship.
"Barney was a contributor to the Global
2000 report for the Carter administration, a call for
depopulation. (The "Global 2000 Report to the
President", and "Global Future: A Time to
Act" are political statements of intent on the part of such policy
centers as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission and the
IMF, to pursue policies that have resulted in the death of 170 million cited in
the reports, but will result in the death of all but 1 billion people by the
Did you know that the UN's Global Biodiversity Assessment
calls for human population to be reduced to 1 or 2 billion by the next decade
(GBA Section 220.127.116.11)? You didn't hear that on the news, did you? Read the
Declaration Towards a Global Ethic. Learn the
definition of what the UN calls a "hate crime". Then you'll know why you're not
being told what's going on.
In anticipation of the Parliament of World Religions, Gerald
Barney helped create an updated document entitled, "Global 2000
Revisited: What Shall We Do?" The appendix to that report contains
an invitation for heads of state and religious leaders to convene in
Thingvellir, Iceland, on January 1, 2000. There before a stone altar, they'd
present handwritten covenants pledging loyalty to Gaia. This event would
constitute what Barney calls "a ritual death to and giving up of the old 20th
century and its ways of thinking and being."
The WCC and Ecumenical Movement are deeply involved. The
report claims that: "following the 1993 Parliament of World Religions,
'Ecumenist religious leaders wasted no time or effort to define 'authentic'
religious belief." And by December, 1994, a cabal of "dozens of prominent
religious leaders joined former president of the WCC, Paulos Mar Gregorius, on
the banks of the river Ganges". Here they composed a document urging spiritual
"empowerment of the UN" and said, "The UN should have a 'Spiritual Cell' with
highly evolved individuals of all religions and cultures. These highly evolved
masters would be assisted by 'vast armies of spiritual adepts' who'd preside
over multi-religious International Academies in every country of the world."
This paganism is at the heart and soul of all secret organizations.
"Karon Singh, president of the UN's 'Temple of
Understanding', and Father Louis Dolan, are among the organizers of the
Parliament of World Religions. These foot soldiers of 'spiritual enlightenment'
were joined by 1,200 religious and political officials from 52 countries." In
"February 1994, 500 Christian and Jewish clergymen from 90 countries gathered in
Jerusalem for the 'Religious Leadership in Secular Society' conference."
Do you see the reality of Revelation 3:20, where Christ
foretold how in this day, He'd be put out of the church that bears His Name -
rejected, knocking to get back in? Not one of these religions or ministers has a
stitch of faith or understanding of God's Word.
The conference indicted "fundamentalism" as a global menace.
Archbishop of Canterbury, George Carey, urged leaders of the three monotheistic
religions to 'weed out the extremes' from their respective faiths. So much for
what Anglicans think of those who hold to God's unchanging Word!
British Theosophist, Benjamin Creme, claims to speak on
behalf of Lord Maitreya, whom he says is the Christ, and "is working with other
members of the 'Spiritual Hierarchy' to bring about the consummation of human
Why Communism is
It should be obvious by now why "the death of Communism" had
to be staged. How else could Michael Gorbachev, chief Marxist-Leninist, and
agent for Pharisees of The City of London, be able to base his operations in the
world's chief anti-Communist country? How else would Western leaders consult
without alarming their own citizens? How else would the masses be prevented from
realizing that the purpose of such consultation is to work out the final details
of a Communist world government?
Ask yourself, who developed, financed and controlled
Communism all these years? Was it not the Pharisees, who killed Jesus Christ?
The World Conference on Religion and Peace is supported by
members of the Catholic hierarchy. It contends that co-operation among religions
will bring peace to the world as present conflicts are mainly religious. Its
words and actions demonstrate that "co-operation" is a euphemism for a
pantheistic unity of religions.
In July 1997, the World Conference on Religion and Peace,
aided by the Australian Multicultural Foundation, held a Religion and Cultural
Diversity Conference in Melbourne, whose goal was to consider "social cohesion,
tolerance and policy-making in religiously diverse societies".
The enemies of Western Christian civilization created a
racially, religiously, ethnically, culturally, intolerant and heterogeneous
society, with ex-Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser's apartheid policies as their
thesis. These conferences are the antithesis to those insoluble problems. Now,
thesis and antithesis are being brought together in conflict, to produce the
predetermined synthesis of a totalitarian society.
Australia's elite were out in full force to discuss the
agenda of the World Conference on Religion and Peace, for brain-washing and
people-control. Australia's Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition are
both members of the Multicultural Foundation. The Governor of Victoria was part
of the Conference planning committee. The Primates of Australia's Greek Orthodox
and Anglican churches were speakers. The most important speakers were the
Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr. George Carey, and President of the Pontifical
Council for Inter-Religious Dialogue, Francis Cardinal Arinze, who, because of
his position is widely regarded as embodying Vatican thought.
The hodge-podge of would-be leaders of global spirituality
of the next millennium showed their true colors when they joined together in a
"prayer" containing elements of fire-worship, pantheism, occultism and atheism.
At the conference dinner, in a darkened room illuminated only by a candle at
each table, approximately 250 bowed their heads and recited this "Prayer for
"Let us focus on the candle, the small quivering fire,
the light in the darkness, the call to the evening prayer, the call to
thanksgiving ... for our togetherness, for our unity, as sons and daughters of
the earth in this vast and ancient land, this sacred soil of the Dreamtime"
"In the presence of the ineffable Other, the Holy Being
of Infinity, the Numinous Beyond, the One and the Ultimate, the Alpha and the
Omega, the Unknown and the Unknowable, Lord of the Cosmos, Center of Creation
God, the God of power and righteousness, we pray to you in the immensity and
grandeur of the world..."
Paganism! The Bible says our God was manifested bodily in
Messiah, seen with human eyes, touched with hands, preached to the Jews who'd
have nothing to do with Him, and to we Gentiles who received Him by Grace (John
1:18; I John 1:1-3; I Timothy 3:16).
Unbelief! The Bible says "How can two walk together except
they be agreed in the faith"? These high-ranking men seemingly agree that God is
both unknown and unknowable - a complete rejection of the one and only faith,
and the Incarnation and divinity of Jesus.
"Dreamtime" is the period of creation from the beginning of
time, explained by Australian Aboriginal myths which also humanize and seek to
sanctify things in nature. These myths were treated at the convention as
parallel to he Genesis account. As in North America, indigenous spirituality is
being used to demand political and land rights, with Christianity branded as an
"imported" religion that harmed the natives. In actual fact Native Title Rights
is the tool to impoverish the Aborigine, and steal the land and resources of all
Australians without royalty.
If only people would read the 1936 Manifesto of the
Australian Communist Party they'd see that the Pharisees are behind this. For
there it is, already written. ("One World Worship",
Dr. Carl McIntire; "Wisconsin Report", November 6,
1997, Comilia R. Ferreira; "Red Over Black", Geoff
Vatican Political Authority over
Barry Chamish reports from Jerusalem that Shimon Peres made
a very strange deal with the Vatican. Consider the evidence:
On September 10, 1993, just three days before the signing of
the Declaration of Principles in Washington, the Italian news magazine
"La Stampa" reported that part of the peace deal was
an unwritten understanding that the Vatican would receive political authority
over the Old City of Jerusalem by the end of the millennium. The newspaper
reported that Shimon Peres had promised to hand over the holy sites of Jerusalem
to the Pope, and that Arafat had accepted the agreement.
In March 1994, the Israeli newsmagazine
"Shishi" published an interview with Mark Halter, a
French intellectual and close friend of Shimon Peres. He said he delivered a
letter from Peres to the Pope the previous May, within which Peres offered the
Vatican hegemony over the Old City of Jerusalem. The article detailed Peres's
offer which essentially turned Jerusalem into an international city overseen by
the Holy See.
In March 1995, the radio station Arutz
Sheva announced that it had received a copy of a cable sent by the
Israeli Embassy in Rome to the Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem, outlining the hand
over of the Old City of Jerusalem to the Vatican. Two days later
"Haaretz" published the cable on its front page. The
Foreign Ministry explained that the cable was genuine but someone had whited out
the word "not." ie We will not transfer authority to the Vatican. Numerous B'nei
B'rak rabbis, who'd canceled Passover meetings with Peres over the issue of the
cable, accepted the explanation and reinvited him to their homes.
Once Labor was in power, negotiations with the Vatican began
immediately, with Foreign Minister Peres sending his Deputy Yossi Beilin to Rome
to hammer out an agreement.
When it was announced in late 1993, the public was told that
many of the clauses were to remain secret. However, some of them were leaked,
leading to the following consequences.
The Foreign Ministry's Legal Affairs Spokesperson, Esther
Samilag, publicly complained about "various capitulations" to the Vatican. She
was immediately transferred to a post at the Israeli Embassy in Katmandu, Nepal.
Avraham Shapira announced in the Knesset that he had
information that all Vatican property in Jerusalem was to become tax exempt, and
that large tracts of real estate on Mount Zion were given to the Pope in
Jerusalem's Deputy Mayor Shmuel Meir announced that he'd
received "information that the properties promised to the Vatican would be
granted extra-territorial status." Perhaps it was unconnected, but Meir was
later killed by a Palestinian truck driver, who was never prosecuted for
Forced to answer the accusations, Beilin admitted "Included
in the Vatican Agreement is the issue of Papal properties in Israel. That will
be resolved by a committee of experts that's already formed." This committee has
not since released any proof of its existence.
With all this in mind, how do we interpret the Vatican's
current position on Jerusalem? The following report was circulated by MSA News.
VATICAN CITY, June 14, 1997 (VIS) - Archbishop Renato
Martino, apostolic nuncio and Holy See permanent observer to the UN, spoke June
9 on the status of Jerusalem, at the New York headquarters of the Path to Peace
The archbishop addressed members of this foundation as well
as US members of the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem.
He began by briefly summarizing the "well-known and
long-standing position of the Holy See with regard to Jerusalem. He stated that
Jerusalem for us, of course, along with the rest of the Holy Land, is that
special link between heaven and earth, that place where God walked and
ultimately died among men. And of course we recognize that others revere
Jerusalem as the city of David and the prophets, and the city known to Mohammed
... It is a spiritual treasure for all of humanity and it's a city of two
peoples, Arabs and Jews, and of the three monotheistic religions, Christianity,
Judaism and Islam."
Archbishop Martino added, "In recent years it's been
increasingly difficult to break through the political and media-imposed
stranglehold on the question of Jerusalem." He recounted Jerusalem's recent
history, recalling in particular the UN General Assembly's Resolution 181 of
1947, calling for Jerusalem to be considered a 'corpus separatum' under the
Trusteeship Council of the UN," a resolution which Israel accepted.
He pointed out that in addressing the gridlock which
resulted from the 1967 Israeli occupation of East Jerusalem, "the Holy See has
therefore advocated granting to Jerusalem of an 'internationally guaranteed
special statute. That's the phrase used by Pope John Paul II in his 1984
Apostolic Letter 'Redemptionis Anno'."
This statute "asks that regardless how the problem of
sovereignty is resolved and who is called upon to exercise it, there should be a
supra-national and international entity endowed with means adequate to insure
the preservation of the special characteristics of the City, its Holy Places,
the freedom to visit them, its religious and ethnic communities, a guarantee of
their essential liberties, and its city plan".
The apostolic nuncio recalled the establishment of
diplomatic relations between the Holy See and Israel in 1993, when both signed
the "Fundamental Agreement." He noted Article 4 of this agreement where "both
the Holy See and Israel affirm their continuing commitment to the 'Status quo'
in the Christian Holy Places."
He also spoke of the problems sparked by Israel's recent
authorization of "a project for the construction of settlements in occupied
territory in East Jerusalem", for which "there was wide- spread international
condemnation." This issue, he reminded those present, was brought before the UN
Security Council on March 7 and March 21 of 1997, but without resolution
"because the sole country on the Security Council which opposed the Resolution
was the United States."
An Emergency Session of the General Assembly, "organized
only nine other times in the history of the United Nations", was held on April
24-25. The Holy See delegation was contacted and asked for suggestions for a
Resolution, said Archbishop Martino. And he recounted the meetings, rough drafts
of proposals and negotiations which followed.
The approved texts of the eventual Resolution, he
underlined, contained "those points championed by the Holy See.... The General
Assembly has here called for 'internationally guaranteed provisions' - the
equivalent of the 'internationally guaranteed special status' called for by Pope
John Paul II. This is particularly noteworthy because in this case, the Arab
delegations all voted for this Resolution, and therefore for this provision."
"The Holy Places within Jerusalem," concluded Archbishop
Martino, "are not merely museum relics to be opened and closed by the dominant
political authority, no matter who that might be at any given moment. They're
living shrines, precious to the hearts and faith of believers."
We ask. Could that supra-national entity which will oversee
the International city of Jerusalem be the Vatican, as Peres promised?
(www.prophezine.com, "The Vatican and Israel" By Barry
The prophet Daniel spoke of these things.
Pass it on . .
. Send this article to someone you
Brother Anthony Grigor-Scott is a
non-denominational minister. He has ministered full-time since 1981, primarily
to other ministers and their congregations in various countries. He pastors
Bible Believers' tiny congregation, and is available to minister in your
For Further Information Contact:
958 Victoria Road, West Ryde, NSW 2114, Australia
Original article: Bible Believers
Fair Use Notice