The UN Plan for Global
Part 1 (Part
by Berit Kjos - June 4,
Emphasis added in bold letters
"The implications for state sovereignty
are also complex.... All states should establish coherent
national migration policies that are ... consistent with
international treaty law."
UN's Global Commission on International
"Why, oh why, is Bush so
stubbornly rejecting the advice of his supporters even though that advice is
consistent with the thunderous message from public opinion surveys?"
A borderless world! Social
solidarity! Economic equality! Housing and health for all! The feel-good
togetherness of serving the greater whole.... The list of utopian promises
stretches the imagination. How can this dream be fulfilled? What will it cost?
Why is migration vital to this process? How free is our president to block
this transformational plan?
This dream of a New World Order was born long before socialist visionaries
(including Franklin Roosevelt and the leaders of the Federal
Council of Churches) enthroned Communist Alger Hiss as the first head of
the United Nations.
[See The Revolutionary
Roots of the UN] Hiss was the primary
author of The UN Charter,
which summarized its vision in noble terms that few could criticize.
"WE THE PEOPLES OF THE UNITED
NATIONS," it began,
"DETERMINED to save succeeding
generations from the scourge of war... to establish conditions under which
justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and
other sources of international law can be maintained... and for these
ends to practice tolerance
and... to employ international machinery for the promotion of the
economic and social advancement of all.... Accordingly, our
respective Governments, through representatives assembled in the city of
San Francisco... do hereby establish an international organization to be
known as the United Nations."
It took the Second World War to make
the new system acceptable to the people. In the wake of that useful
crisis, the masses willingly embraced the UN promise of "economic and
social advancement of all" under the guiding hand of the new "international
In the decades that followed, most people seemed to dismiss UN treaties and
declarations as "soft laws" and policies with little effect on national
sovereignty. They didn't know the many ways UN declarations would permeate
national laws and policies.
[See Trading U.S. Rights for UN
Rules] The mainstream media didn't tell us. So when the The Global Commission on International
Migration was launched by the United Nations Secretary-General and a
number of governments on December 9, 2003, few saw the red
But America is awakening. An
immigrant-friendly nation, it has welcomed
grateful immigrants from around the world into its system. Now, it faces
something something new. The word immigration implies people
moving across a national border into another country. In contrast,
migration simply means people moving. No border! It supports the
vision of a borderless global society, and it intentionally clashes
with national sovereignty, laws and independence. Thomas Sowell summarizes
some of its current problems:
"Under affirmative action, combined with amnesty,
[illegals] would have preferences in jobs and other benefits. Those who set
up their own businesses would be entitled to preferences in getting
government contracts. Their children would be able to get into
college ahead of the children of American citizens with better academic
qualifications. ... [I]f an
illegal alien gets stopped for going through a red light... in many
communities the cop is forbidden to arrest him.... Under a provision
recently passed by the Senate, illegal aliens who forged Social Security
cards not only get a pass, they get to collect Social Security
benefits. ... We have seen what havoc such notions and practices have
created after mass immigration under 'guest worker' programs in
legalized lawlessness fuels the "crisis" needed to persuade the masses to
accept mass surveillance, universal data collection, and other intrusive
strategies for worldwide control. And it gets worse:
"Based on a one-year
in-depth study, a researcher estimates there are about 240,000 illegal
immigrant sex offenders in the United States who have had an average of four
"The immigration reform bill now under
congressional consideration would grant amnesty to some 10 million illegal
immigrants.... CIRA would transform the United States socially,
economically and politically. Within two decades, the character of the
nation would differ dramatically from what exists today."
"When Sept. 11 hijackers Hani Hanjour and Khalid
Almihdhar needed help getting fraudulent government-issued photo IDs before
embarking on their suicide mission, they hopped into a van and headed to the
parking lot of a 7-Eleven store in Falls Church, Va. That's where scores of
illegal alien day laborers ply bogus identity documents to other illegal
aliens from around the world.... Nearly five years later, illegal alien day
laborers like the ones who unwittingly assisted the 9/11 hijackers have
virtually no fear of being arrested."
of secrecy and a flood of misleading propaganda hides the truth from taxpayers
who cover the costs. For example, the title of the "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North
America" may sound
good, but it actually undermines both security and prosperity for ordinary
citizens. Wondering why their elected leaders ignore their pleas, many face
rising lawlessness, unthinkable litter, lost jobs, and continual fear of
The reasons are simple. International regulations have already bound
nations around the world to regional as well as global laws and policies. To
understand their aims, let's look at the United Nation's Report of the Global Commission on
International Migration [GCIM]. Chapter 6 warns us that "international
migration is a complex phenomenon," and most states (nations) "recognize the
importance of international migration and seek to address it in a way that
enables them to respect their international obligations."
What does that mean? Might the word "respect"
actually imply "obedience" to international guidelines?
An illusion of national
The subtle language in many UN documents hides the
assault on national sovereignty. While sounding affirmative, it undermines any
"sovereign" action that might oppose UN policies. The UN Declaration on Human
Rights illustrates this manipulative language well. Its
Article 18 upholds "the right to freedom of thought, conscience and
religion..." Article 19 affirms "the right to freedom of opinion and
But Article 29 states that "these rights and
freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles
of the United Nations." In other words, its promise of "human rights" does
not apply to those who would criticize the UN or its policies. Nor does it
apply to Christians who cling to God's "offensive" truths -- or refuse to
follow UNESCO's Declaration
on the Role of Religion.
The migration issue
shifts national sovereignty onto the same slippery ground. In the numbered
items below, notice the GCIM's promising
assurance -- followed by a clear denial of traditional sovereignty:
"8. First, state sovereignty is the very
basis for international cooperation....
"9. Second, with sovereignty comes
responsibility. As the International Commission on
Intervention and State Sovereignty (2001) has observed, recent years
have witnessed a reorientation 'from sovereignty as control to
sovereignty as responsibility in both internal functions and external
duties.' Sovereignty as responsibility has become the minimum
content of good international citizenship. Just as individuals have rights
and responsibilities as citizens of states, so states have rights and
responsibilities as members of the international community. [Note: That responsibility falls primarily on the "rich"
developed nations considered capable of hosting, funding and managing the
world's migrating human resources.]
"10. ...The European Union (EU) can be viewed as
an example of a group of states that have retained their sovereignty
"11. ...States establish international bodies
when certain issues – or ‘common goods’ – warrant a more formal and
collective form of governance."
The following points show some of the ways nations must cooperate
with regional and global policies:
If states are to address the issue of international migration in a coherent
manner, they must have... criteria for the entry and residents of
non-citizens that are consistent with international law. ...
[T]hey should at minimum address the following issues:
family reunion, asylum, refugee protection and resettlement;
prevention of irregular migration and the promotion of regular migration
[The Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act (CIRA) would add an extra 84
million legal immigrants to the nation's population];
integration, including the rights and obligations of migrants, citizens and
"17. All states should adopt a coherent approach
to international migration that is consistent with international law
and other relevant norms....
"21. ...This in turn requires effective data
collection, policy analysis, research, monitoring and evaluation....
"23. ... develop an infrastructure that
provides social, educational and legal assistance to migrants, and
that helps the host society adapt to the presence of migrants;
that resident foreign nationals are effectively represented by migrant
associations... [A partnership between U.S. and Mexico provides such
legal protection of "human rights" for illegal immigrants in the U.S. Small
wonder it's hard for U.S. courts to deal with foreign
• build up a capacity for data
collection and analysis, research, monitoring and
Regional integration, such as the
European Union (EU), was planned long ago as a stepping stone toward global
governance. Since the regulations for regionalism are established at the UN
level, this initial merger of nations -- such as Canada, United States and
Mexico -- redefines sovereignty and submits everyone to
international controls. Ashley Mote, an independent member of the European
Parliament, explains how this revolutionary system would swallow up any
representative form of government:
the EU's public face - the unelected commission - is part of the charade.
Power does not lie with them. It lies with the senior staff running their
departments, entrenched by some 3000 working groups and committees on which
no elected MEP sits.... We do not know what their budgets are, how they are
financed, or who approves their costs. Indeed, we do not even know what
powers they have been given, nor by whom. And we cannot get rid of them....
"The EU would no longer be the servant of the
member states. It would have become their master. Every previous treaty was
a small step along that road.... The other 24 commissioners, each appointed
by the other member states... are figure-heads. They take the flak in the
public arena, and make announcements decided for them by their senior staff,
with the guidance of the secret committees.
"...officially above the commission sits a Council
of Ministers.... But the council is just more of the same elaborate
illusion of accountable government. ... The European Parliament
sits below this vast superstructure... designed to create an illusion of
accountable democracy. A condescending pat on the head for voters held in
"...the EU’s parliament... is the repository
of an unspoken agreement between the left and the multinationals. ...
In effect, the left has said to the multinationals: you can have your
markets stitched up for you, if we can indulge ourselves in endless
social engineering. Big business has agreed. The result is a largely
supportive parliament both from the left and right of the political
Today's euphemistic propaganda for regional
governance continues to mislead the public. These statements by GCIM show only the
positive side of the issue:
34. In the EU, for example, citizens of
member states can move with relative ease from one country to
another, enjoying the benefits of a common labour market....
35. Efforts have also been made to establish
various types of economic integration and related freedom of movement
agreements in other regions of the world, including the North American Free
Trade Agreement (NAFTA)....
The Commission commends in particular the New
Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD), which
aims to establish an integrated socio-economic development framework
In Parts 2 and 3, we will look more closely at how the beliefs, cultural
values, poverty and lawlessness inherent to the migration crisis create a
public mindset that welcomes other UN goals: universal surveillance, universal
data tracking, a new kind of "human settlement," and collective participation
in the dialectic process. With the Canadian, anti-Christian UN
leader, Maurice Strong, as one of the guiding lights behind this
revolution, my biggest concern might be the UN "laws" that ban Biblical
outreach to this new "mission field" in our midst.
Meanwhile, study this chart
[www.crossroad.to/charts/paradigm_shift.html] and remember God's promise to His people:
"...in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him
who loved us. For I am persuaded that neither death nor life, nor angels nor
principalities nor powers, nor things present nor things to come, nor height
nor depth, nor any other created thing, shall be able to separate us from
the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord." Romans 8:37-39
Part 2: The
emerging New World Order
1. Report of the Global Commission on International
Migration, CHAPTER SIX: Creating coherence: The governance of international
2. Phyllis Schlafly President defies most Republicans on
immigration, 5-29-06, www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/phyllisschlafly/2006/05/29/199084.html
3. "The Revolutionary
Roots of the UN at www.crossroad.to/Excerpts/chronologies/un.htm
4. UN Charter at
See also "Declaration on
Tolerance" at www.crossroad.to/Quotes/globalism/Tolerance.htm
5. "Migration in an interconnected world: New
directions for action, The Global Commission on International
Migration at www.gcim.org/en/
Thomas Sowell, 5-25-06, Bordering on fraud, part III,
7. "1 million sex crimes by illegals," 5-31-06, http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50441
8. "100 Million More Immigrants in 20
Years?" 5-16-06, www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/5/15/165712.shtml?s=et
9. 9/11, the Pentagon, and our
and Prosperity Partnership Of North America,
12. MALDEF at www.maldef.org/legal/index.htm
and "Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) at www.discoverthenetwork.org/printgroupProfile.asp?grpid=6156.
The latter describes it as: "The most influential Hispanic advocacy group in
the United States.
A creation of the Ford Foundation.... Advocates open
borders, free college tuition for illegal immigrants, lowered educational
standards to accommodate Hispanics, and voting rights for criminals.
'California is going to be a Hispanic state, and anyone who doesn’t like it
should leave. They should go back to Europe' -- Co-founder Mario Obledo....
Just between 1996 and 1998, MALDEF received more than $9 million in combined
grants from the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller
Foundation, and the Carnegie Corporation."
13. Ashley Mote MEP, "Beware the Secret Heart of the
Original article: Crossroad
Fair Use Notice