U.S. Weighing Readiness for Military Action Against Iran|
By Ann Scott Tyson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, April 26, 2008
The nation's top military officer said yesterday that the Pentagon is planning for "potential military courses of
action" as one of several options against Iran, criticizing what he called the Tehran government's
"increasingly lethal and malign influence" in Iraq.
Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said a conflict with Iran would be
"extremely stressing" but not impossible for U.S. forces, pointing to reserve
capabilities in the Navy and Air Force.
"It would be a mistake to think that we are out of combat capability," he
said at a Pentagon news conference. Speaking of Iran's intentions, Mullen said:
"They prefer to see a weak Iraq neighbor. . . . They have expressed long-term
goals to be the regional power."
Mullen made clear that he prefers a diplomatic solution and does not expect
imminent action. "I have no expectations that we're going to get into a conflict
with Iran in the immediate future," he said.
Mullen's statements and others by Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates recently signal new rhetorical
pressure on Iran by the Bush administration amid what officials say is increased
Iranian provision of weapons, training and financing to Iraqi groups that are
attacking and killing Americans.
In a speech Monday, Gates said Iran "is hell-bent on acquiring nuclear
weapons." He said war would be "disastrous" but added that "the military option
must be kept on the table, given the destabilizing policies of the regime and
the risks inherent in a future Iranian nuclear threat."
Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, who was
nominated this week to head all U.S. forces in the Middle East, is preparing a
briefing soon on increased Iranian involvement in Iraq, Mullen said. The
briefing will detail, for example, the discovery in Iraq of weapons that were
very recently manufactured in Iran, he said.
"The Iranian government pledged to halt such activities some months ago. It's
plainly obvious they have not," Mullen said. He said unrest in the Iraqi city of
Basra had highlighted a "level of involvement" by Iran that had not been clear
But while Mullen and Gates have said that the government in Tehran must know
of Iranian actions in Iraq, Mullen said he has "no smoking gun which could prove
that the highest leadership is involved."
In an incident early local time Thursday, a cargo ship contracted by the U.S. military fired "several bursts" of warning shots at two fast
boats that approached in international waters off the Iranian coast, defense
officials said yesterday.
The unidentified small boats approached the Westward Venture, a ship carrying
U.S. military hardware, as it headed north through the central Persian Gulf, said Cmdr. Lydia Robertson, spokeswoman for the
Navy's 5th Fleet.
The U.S. ship initiated communications, and after receiving no response, it
fired a flare. The speedboats continued to approach, so the ship fired warning
shots. The boats then left the area, Robertson said.
In January, five Iranian patrol boats sped toward a U.S. warship in the Gulf
and dropped small, boxlike objects in the water, an incident that President Bush called "a provocative act." The objects turned out
to pose no threat to U.S. vessels.
Original article: Washington Post
Fair Use Notice